It may have had some credibility, say, 50 years ago, when divorce was a rare occurrence and adultery was a crime. But, nowadays, over half of heterosexual marriages end in divorce.
Marriage is no longer what it was fifty years ago. There are many other arguments against gay marriage, each as refutable as the rest. If no convincing arguments can be made, and all that is stopping two people from legally spending the rest of their lives together is the prejudice and ignorance of people who refuse to listen to the facts, why are people who love eachother not allowed to be married?
Discrimination and hatred are wrong. Love knows no boundaries. Love does not care if the two people are different races. Love does not care if the two people are the same gender.
Love is blind to differences and similarities. There is only one truth that people should never forget: Filed under Original Works , Schoolwork. Hi, this is a comment. You are commenting using your WordPress. You are commenting using your Twitter account. You are commenting using your Facebook account.
Notify me of new comments via email. April 20, at 5: Leave a Reply Cancel reply Enter your comment here Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Email required Address never made public.
The United States is supposed to be run based off of human rights and what works for the government. Many government officials try to run the government based on their religious beliefs, when the officials religious belief should not be taken into consideration on the judgement of gay marriage. The federal Defence of Marriage law was even deemed unconstitutional by one of the judges of the supreme court, Joseph L.
The government should be able to follow the rules that had been set hundreds of years ago. It is not acceptable for the government to go against its own words, not allow people to marry due to their religious beliefs when the constitution clearly states that religion and state are supposed to be separated. Not allowing gay marriage is also discrimination against all of the gay people in the United States. Not allowing gay marriage prevents gay people from gaining government protections that married people gain.
It is denying them to file joint income taxes, which makes life much easier for couples that are living together.
They are also not allowed to make medical decisions for their spouses if he or she becomes incapacitated and unable to make wishes for treatment Wolfson. This is not fair to gay couples because they cannot do many of the things that a straight couple can do. For example, government protections provided by marriage apply to straight couples, but do not for gay couples. Citizenship and Immigration Services would bend over backward to keep the couple together. Gay marriages in the United States should be treated the same as straight marriages.
If a straight person marries someone that is not a United States citizen, that person becomes a citizen just by the marriage. It should work the same for a gay marriage, this is discriminating against gay people by not giving them the same rights that straight people receive when married. Arguments against gay marriage are often contradicting or incorrect. When the truth is, there are only a few instances in the bible that state homosexuality as wrong, while there are many more that state women are of lesser value than men.
Using the bible as a resource for an argument against gay marriage is not the best because of its contradictions. Some people may even say that legalizing gay marriage would eventually lead to legalizing incest, bestial, and polygamous marriages. This argument is possibly one of the worst because there is nothing that can prove it.
There is more evidence against gay marriage causing the legalization of these other types of marriage. Out of all of the countries that have legalized gay marriage, none of them have come anywhere close to legalizing incest, beastial, or polygamous marriages. Yet it is easily the weakest. Who says who marriage is to be defined by? And such simple, nebulous declarations are hardly a compelling reason. The concept of not denying people their rights unless you can show a compelling reason to do so is the very basis of the American ideal of human rights.
Marriage is for procreation. I, for one, would love to be there when the proponent of such an argument is to explain to his post-menopausal mother or impotent father that since they cannot procreate, they must now surrender their wedding rings! That would be fun to watch! Again, such an argument fails to persuade based on the marriages society does allow routinely, without even a second thought.
So if children are truly the priority here, why is this allowed?
When you’re writing a persuasive essay about a controversial topic such as same-sex marriage, which has recently been legalized in Australia, it’s important that your thesis takes a .
Persuasive Essay on Same Sex Marriage There has been a lot of conflict concerning the topic of same sex marriage.
Fighting for Same Sex Marriage Essay - There was a pounding feeling in her head as she was carried out of the car. A tickling sensation in her forehead from the blood rushing down her face; it was a small injury that the paramedics easily cleaned up. Apr 20, · Original Work: Persuasive Speech/Essay for Same-Sex Marriage. A/N: A persuasive essay that I did for my Grade 8 Language Arts class. I liked it and I ended up getting an A on it, so I thought I’d post it here.
Included: same sex marriage essay content. Preview text: There has been a lot of conflict concerning the topic of same sex marriage. Most states have ruled it unconstitutional, and some have disagreed. But what really is the solution to this problem? Show people really are penalized for expressing their tr. The main points the authors both discus is the meaning of marriage itself, the social impact same sex marriage will have on society, and the influence on children Show More Gay Marriage Essay.