Poor people may not have enough fees to hire attorneys who can put up a strong defense in court. Innocent people have thus ended up being executed a simply because they could not hire attorney who could represent them well. The issue of poverty notwithstanding, suspects may get convicted to die simply because an error was made by a judge who is all human and bound to make mistakes.
All worlds' religions including certain cults teach against killing. Christians, for example, state that God is the sole provider of life and no human being has the power or authority to take human life. Other religious hold a similar stand. If almost everyone living on this planet is taught about sanctity of life, why should a state organ, like the judiciary, come in and do something contrary to these teachings.
Arguments against death sentence are solid. Any person looking at these arguments rationally will be convinced that death sentence should be abolished by those who still practice it. We are in the 21 st century and so barbaric executions like those of days of slave should be done away with.
Death penalty fails to respect sanctity of life and should thus be seen as an unfeeling, immoral and inhumane act. Innocent people have ended up being victims of errors made by justice systems. All these reasons form a formidable force that should push any stubborn nation, institution or individual to admit that it is a high time that death penalty was abolished.
Against the Death Penalty. Affiliate Program Refer our service to your friends! Live Chat Order now. To register place your 1st order. FAQ What is a custom writing service? Are your writers qualified for the custom writing? How quick can my order be accomplished? Are essays offered by your company truly custom-written? One of the most famous cases of the murder of an innocent man was execution of Timothy Evans in He was tried and executed for the murder of his baby daughter Geraldine.
Thus, taking the life of innocent people, we become murderers. On the other hand, the death penalty is the only just punishment for many of the relatives and friends of the victims.
It is difficult to live, when you know that the man who killed your loved one is still breathing. Furthermore, the most common and reasonable argument is that the death penalty is an effective deterrent. The fear of death affects everybody, and criminals are no exception. If they understand that after the serious crime they must bear such punishment, they should think twice before they commit to it.
This argument is supported by statistics which reveal that the crime rate in countries where in this form of punishment still exists is far less as compared to those countries wherein it has been abolished. In conclusion, there are many of pros and cons of the death penalty, but there is no single solution. Because the issues concerning life and death are always the most difficult. In my opinion, the death penalty is absolutely contrary to moral principles and it is not able to bring us closer to justice.
And the question arises: The thesis statement is too general The first paragraph against the death penalty needs further development; it is not enough to just give an example. It prevents them from ever murdering again. It removes the burden from taxpayers. We all live in a society with the same basic rights and guarantees. We have the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness with equal opportunities.
This is the basis for our society. It is the foundation on which everything else is built upon. When someone willfully and flagrantly attacks this foundation by murdering another, robbing them of all they are, and all they will ever be, then that person can no longer be a part of this society.
The only method that completely separates cold blooded murderers from our society is the death penalty. As the 20th century comes to a close, it is evident that our justice system is in need of reform. This reform will shape the future of our country, and we cannot jump to quick solutions such as the elimination of the death penalty. As of now, the majority of American supports the death penalty as an effective solution of punishment. Why not execute them and save society the cost of their keep?
However, it seems obvious to some Americans that the death penalty is a just and proper way to handle convicted murderers. Whatever henious crime one does,we are not uncivilised and barbaric to take the lives of others.
If we ought to give them death sentence as punishment,then what distinguishes us from the criminals? If insecurity is the major issue behind demanding capital punishment,then the best solution is framing the punishment in such a way that the culprit would never be a threat to the society,not hanging to death. The death penalty is funded by the taxes we pay to the government.
The racial and economic bias is not a valid argument against the death penalty. It is an argument against the courts and their unfair system of sentencing. The third argument is actually a rebuttal to a claim made by some supporters of the death penalty.
Argument Against The Death Penalty Essay Words | 5 Pages. In , 17 year old Johnny Frank Garrett was put to death for confessing to raping and murdering a year old nun. A crime as heinous as this certainly deserves the death penalty as a punishment right? The only problem is .
Mar 25, · Death penalty is the most discussed punishment, which does not leave many people indifferent. There are many moral arguments against the death penalty, which should make us think twice about our reasons for supporting it. The first reason against the death penalty is . However, the critics of the death penalty base their arguments on rights ethics, Kantian moral and ethical principles as well as the cost implications. A critical analysis reveals that the death sentence is an effective punishment that serves intended purposes of deterrence and retribution, Delfino & .
English Task –Argumentative Essay The Death Penalty The argument of whether the death penalty is effective is an age-old and contentious issue. Many people believe that “an eye for an eye” mentality is barbaric and goes against basic human morals. Others are of the opinion that it . The death penalty is the punishment of execution, carried out legally against an individual convicted of a capital crime. Those who support the death penalty might argue that it is just, and deters further murders, while others against it may argue that it is inhumane and it doesn’t solve any core problems in that person’s life.