This is not entirely true, upon reaching certain age requirements and obtaining a F. A concealed handgun simply allows the weapons to be carried in public on the waist or other concealed ways. The third misconception is that anyone can get a license and carry a gun. If you do any Research whatsoever and have any knowledge of concealed carry laws, you will know that this is entirely false.
There are several requirements that most concealed carry laws have in order to obtain a license: You cannot have a criminal record and you cannot have any history of anger issues or any other psychological disorders. The last misconception is that criminals will get guns and harm citizens. This is the most irrational argument I have heard against concealed carry laws… Do street gangs and criminals currently have concealed carry licenses?
Do they have weapons anyway? The point is with or without gun laws; criminals obtain and also carry legal firearms illegally. The only difference with concealed carry laws is that now we can defend ourselves.
The concealed carrying of handguns increases the likelihood of unintended shootings taking place. Approximately 50 people are unintentionally shot each day in America and a child under 15 years of age dies every other day from unintended gunfire.
Criminals are more likely to arm themselves with firearms if they suspect that victims may also be armed. Felons report that they often carry firearms to deter victims from resisting. A victim drawing a gun during an attack sends a signal to the offender that more force must be used to overpower the victim during an attack. Adults who carry concealed handguns are often inadequately trained. Public safety should be left to trained police officers who are less likely to shoot innocent bystanders.
Responsible adults with concealed handguns make it more difficult for police to distinguish criminals from ordinary citizens and to identify perpetrators during a shooting. Carrying concealed handguns needlessly intimidates other citizens.
The only way to stop a bad guy with a gun is with a good guy with a gun. When giving the last instructions to his disciples in the Garden of Gethsemane, Jesus Christ stated: This admonishment should never be taken literally, as it has just been a warning about difficult times coming.
However, sometimes the statement is used as an evidence to justify the right if not obligation for everyone to bear arms. The right to have and to bear arms is often disputed and has different points of approach. In details, there is a discussion on individual and collective right and also on circumstances in which bearing arms is justified. It goes without saying that in different countries the problem is solved in different way.
Among other reasons, religion is here and there a decisive matter to state these or that rules. The Muslims, for example, generally follow the Sharia law. The Sharia law gives a temporary permission to bear arms in times of civil strife or violence. Further, legislation is deeply reasoned by the ruling regime. In totalitarian regimes bearing arms is usually forbidden and persecuted by law. The same situation is typical for modern China where there are strict firearm control regulations.
In democratic states bearing arms is often permitted, but not always. In Finland, for example, you can receive a permission to have to possess a firearm, but in public you are not free to carry it. In Spain, you receive a license from the Civil Guard Authority dependently from the class of weapon and for a limited period of time. In the meantime, in Switzerland it is not only permitted but also required to keep arms for those who received training in the national armed forces as they are regarded as the potential defenders of the state.
The rate of official firearms is the highest in Switzerland, and at the same time the rate of delinquency is the lowest in the world. In the USA situation is different from state to state, and the most controversial document the states make a start from is the Bill of Rights, the Second Amendment, if to be more specific: When the American state was only at the sawn of its existence, it was natural to solve problems with a musket and a rifle.
But then the function of defense and public control was passed to police, and thus they can be regarded as exclusive bearers of weapon. Williams meanwhile pays attention to the point that technically all the legally capable men if to be more specific, males from 17 to 45 are the members of unofficial militia and potential defenders of the nation.
Hereby, the right to keep and bear arms is approached as a collective one and not individual. But this is a more individual-oriented focus, which is standing for the right of individuals serving in militia. In this way the first two models concentrate on the intention of the Amendment, on its preamble.
Such an approach is widely criticized. This is a individual-rights model. The matter is, the USA has case law, and therefore the interpretation of the Constitution can change from case to case. Thus, the case District of Columbia v.
“Without the right to bear arms, we would have anarchy in the streets, the criminals would still have guns, and violent crime would escalate,” the opponents of gun control say (Killias, ). In Australia, it is testified, public safety has essentially decreased after intensified gun control.
Essay about The Second Amendment: Americans Have the Right to Bear Arms! - The United States Constitution says that U.S. Citizens have the right to bear arms. Even though this guarantee was written with no constraints, there are now laws that limit certain aspects of gun ownership.
The Right to Bear Arms Introduction The Second Amendment to the United States Constitution reads, "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." ("Second Amendment to the United States Constitution"). Citizens have the right to bear arms. It just all depends how they take action. According to a report by engineering statistician the general public is 5. 7 times more likely to be arrested for violent offenses and 5 times more likely to be arrested for non-violent offenses, than .
The Right to Bear Arms Chad Hill American Government Maj. David Thorneloe January 09, The right to bear arms is the most important liberty to American citizens. It allows people to protect themselves from other people and the government. The Right to Keep and Bear Arms Essay. The Right to Keep and Bear Arms: A Right to Self-Defense Against Criminals and Despots by Robert Dowlut[*] If men were angels, no government would be necessary. If angels were to govern men, neither external nor internal controls on .